Sub-categorization of OBCs — MCQ Practice
Interactive MCQ Practice
Test your knowledge. Click “Solve” to reveal options, select your answer, then check the result. 5 questions available.
With reference to the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes (OBCs), consider the following statements: 1. The Justice Rohini Commission was constituted to examine the inequitable distribution of benefits among OBC communities. 2. The Supreme Court in E.V. Chinnaiah case upheld the validity of OBC sub-categorization. 3. Tamil Nadu was the first state to implement internal reservation within OBCs. 4. Sub-categorization requires a constitutional amendment as it changes the basic structure. Which of the statements given above are correct?
The concept of 'creamy layer' in the context of OBC reservations was introduced to:
Which of the following best describes the findings of the Justice Rohini Commission regarding OBC reservation benefits?
The State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh (2020) case is significant for OBC sub-categorization because it:
Consider the following statements about state-level OBC sub-categorization models: 1. Karnataka follows a four-tier classification system (A, B, C, D) 2. Bihar created a separate Extremely Backward Classes (EBC) category 3. Tamil Nadu allocates 30% of OBC quota to Most Backward Classes 4. All states must follow a uniform model prescribed by the Centre Which of the statements given above are correct?