What is the primary difference between hexagonal close packing (HCP) and cubic close packing (CCP)?

The primary difference lies in their stacking sequence of layers. In HCP, the third layer of spheres is directly aligned with the first layer, resulting in an A-B-A-B... stacking pattern. In contrast, for CCP (which is equivalent to FCC), the third layer is offset from both the first and second layers, leading to an A-B-C-A-B-C... stacking pattern. While both structures have the same coordination number (12) and packing efficiency (74%), their long-range order and unit cell symmetries differ, impacting properties like slip planes and ductility.

How do tetrahedral and octahedral voids form in close-packed structures?

Tetrahedral voids form when a sphere in one layer rests in the depression created by three spheres in the layer below it. The void is surrounded by these four spheres, forming a tetrahedron. Octahedral voids are larger and form when a triangular void in one layer is directly above a triangular void in the layer below, but oriented oppositely. This creates a void surrounded by six spheres (three from the upper layer and three from the lower layer), forming an octahedron.

What is the relationship between the number of atoms and the number of voids in a close-packed structure?

In any close-packed structure (HCP or CCP), if there are 'N' constituent atoms or spheres, there will be 'N' octahedral voids and '2N' tetrahedral voids. This 1:1:2 ratio (atoms : octahedral voids : tetrahedral voids) is a crucial concept for solving problems related to the stoichiometry of ionic compounds where smaller ions occupy these voids.

Why is the packing efficiency of HCP and CCP the same at 74%?

Both HCP and CCP represent the most efficient ways to pack identical spheres, achieving the maximum possible density. This is because in both arrangements, each sphere is surrounded by 12 nearest neighbors (coordination number 12), which is the highest possible for identical spheres. The local environment around any given sphere is identical in both structures, leading to the same optimal packing density, even though their long-range stacking patterns differ.

Can a body-centered cubic (BCC) structure be considered a close-packed structure?

No, a body-centered cubic (BCC) structure is not considered a true close-packed structure. While it's a common metallic structure, its coordination number is 8 (each atom touches 8 nearest neighbors), which is less than the 12 found in HCP and CCP. Consequently, its packing efficiency is 68%, which is lower than the 74% achieved by HCP and CCP. True close-packed structures maximize the coordination number and packing efficiency.

← ALL TOPICS

Chemistry

NEXT TOPIC →

Number of Atoms in Unit Cell

Close Packed Structures

Chemistry

NEET UG

Version 1Updated 22 Mar 2026

Explore This Topic

Definition Deep Explanation Core Principles NEET Importance Problem Strategy Practice Problems MCQ Practice Quick Revision

Close packed structures represent the most efficient arrangements of identical spherical particles in three-dimensional space, maximizing the volume occupied by the particles and minimizing the empty space. This arrangement is driven by the tendency of atoms to achieve the highest possible coordination number, which is the number of nearest neighbors an atom has. The two primary types of close pac…

Quick Summary

Close packed structures describe the most efficient arrangements of identical spheres (atoms) in a crystal lattice, minimizing empty space. This concept is built from 1D (coordination number 2), to 2D (square close packing with CN 4, hexagonal close packing with CN 6), and finally to 3D.

In 3D, two main types emerge from stacking 2D hexagonal layers: Hexagonal Close Packing (HCP) with an A-B-A-B stacking sequence, and Cubic Close Packing (CCP), which is equivalent to Face-Centered Cubic (FCC), with an A-B-C-A-B-C stacking sequence.

Both HCP and CCP have a coordination number of 12 and a maximum packing efficiency of 74%. When layers are stacked, two types of voids are formed: tetrahedral voids (surrounded by 4 spheres) and octahedral voids (surrounded by 6 spheres).

For 'N' atoms in a close-packed structure, there are 'N' octahedral voids and '2N' tetrahedral voids. Understanding these structures is vital for predicting material properties and the stoichiometry of compounds formed by occupying these voids.

Vyyuha

Your 6-Month Blueprint, Updated Nightly

AI analyses your progress every night. Wake up to a smarter plan. Every. Single.…

Key Concepts

Coordination Number in Close Packing

The coordination number (CN) is a direct measure of how many immediate neighbors an atom has in a crystal…

Packing Efficiency of HCP and CCP

Packing efficiency quantifies how much of the total volume of a crystal lattice is occupied by the atoms,…

Types and Number of Voids

When spheres are packed in a 3D close-packed arrangement, empty spaces, known as voids or interstitial sites,…

1D Packing: — CN=2

2D SCP: — CN=4, Square voids

2D HCP: — CN=6, Triangular voids

3D HCP: — A-B-A-B stacking, Hexagonal unit cell, CN=12, PE=74%, Examples: Mg, Zn

3D CCP (FCC): — A-B-C-A-B-C stacking, FCC unit cell, CN=12, PE=74%, Examples: Cu, Ag, Au

Voids: — For N atoms:

- Octahedral voids = N - Tetrahedral voids = 2N

Radius Ratios:

- Tetrahedral void: $r_{void}/r_{host} = 0.225$ - Octahedral void: $r_{void}/r_{host} = 0.414$

HCP is ABAB, CCP is ABCABC. Both are 12 and 74.

Hexagonal Close Packing: Alternating Basic Arrangement By Aligning Back.

Cubic Close Packing: All Balls Change Alignment Between Centers.

Voids: — 'O' for Octahedral is like 'One' (N voids). 'T' for Tetrahedral is like 'Two' (2N voids). Octahedral is 'O' (big letter), so it's the larger void. Tetrahedral is 'T' (small letter), so it's the smaller void.

← ALL TOPICS

Chemistry

NEXT TOPIC →

Number of Atoms in Unit Cell